from a very early age I was bothered by religion, but not for reasons you might expect. let me take you back to middle school and one of my last video game addictions: Sim City 2000. I loved that game, but it exposed my intense dislike for inconsistencies. observe:

nice 12x4 blocks of residential. 12x4 was my building block size. the property was all close enough to the street so it wouldn't undergo traffic starvation, but the blocks were big enough to scale well into the 4x4-building-sized endgame, without too much land being sacrificed to streets.

anyway, I digress. in no time, these blocks would fill, and my little city would begin to bustle — BUT WHAT'S THIS?!

I had an issue with churches because I wanted to maximize population. people don't live in churches, so churches are wasting precious residentially-zoned land!

but it got worse. churches were a type of building that never went abandoned, so the only way to promote new construction was to destroy it. but when I bulldozed the church, the land beneath it was dezoned! look!

why do they get such a priviledge? if every time a building is constructed, is there a 1/250 chance it becomes a church? is the church going to stage a slow takeover of all the land in my city by this method? NOT ON MY WATCH! I bulldozed all those churches and rezoned the land as dense residential.

as a result of this strange childhood I've always viewed churches as land that could be used better, but never will be. they just clog up the streets every Sunday. like the one near Chez Fun that was on the way to Alice's.

but Cindy and I just moved to a new place, and within throwing distance of our place is this daycare which looks kinda funny. I guess I understand that a religiously-inclined daycare would want to look like a church, but it still strikes me as silly.

and then I saw their sign today on my way to work:

please note that I took the picture on my way back home.

huh.


The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.Albert Einstein


a wingnut is trying to protect traditional marriage again, but it's not what you think:

he's trying to ban divorce.

People who supported Prop 8 weren't trying to take rights away from gays, they just wanted to protect traditional marriage. That's why I'm confident that they will support this initiative, even though this time it will be their rights that are diminished. To not support it would be hypocritical.

it would be hypocritical, wouldn't it?

in a way, I hope he makes it to the ballot.
 

UPDATE: wow, this sure is making its way around the internet. as usual, someone else says it better:

It’s hard to tell whether Marcotte is being serious or ironical about this (his picture is hard to read). Either way, it begs the question of whether people are willing to follow their beliefs to their logical, if unpleasant, conclusions. My experience in life has been that most of the time, people are not.Morgan Clendaniel

my experience correlates.


to help you cut through the crap more efficiently:

replace all mentions of "pro-family" with "pro-church".

because it's pretty obvious they don't care about their families at all1.

1 not that he's a particularly good christian, either… but the most outspoken christians tend to be the least christ-like

Danny's problem with Pascal's Wager:

Say you do believe in god due to Pascal's Wager. You believe in God because it benefits you. Do you really want to believe in a god that's impressed by that?

the man makes a good point.

Christian scriptures spend a lot of time spelling out the evils of selfishness — if you believe based on Pascal's Wager, you don't really have a chance.